Keeping a criminal case pending is violation of Article 21 of Constitution: Delhi HC

Posted on:05 Apr 2016 17:47:03
Keeping a criminal case pending is violation of Article 21 of Constitution: Delhi HC
05 April 2016 Current Affairs: Delhi High Court on 4 April 2016 held that keeping a criminal case pending for indefinite period amounts to violation of constitutional rights of the accused recognized under Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution of India.The ruling was passed by Justice Suresh Kait in Joginder Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) case.The court also quashed the first information report (FIR) registered at Mangolpuri police station against Joginder Singh, with the allegations of forgery of documents of a stolen car and the consequential proceedings in the trial court.Criminal cases against accused were pending since 1998, although nothing material was brought to the notice delaying the process of framing charge against Singh. The FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468 (forgery for cheating) and 471 (using as genuine a forged document) of Indian Penal Code.The court said that the case could not be registered against the accused only on the basis of disclosure statement without any supporting material.While quashing the FIR, the court referred Supreme Court’s judgment of 2009 case of the Vakil Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar which was termed as violation of constitutional guarantee of a speedy investigation and trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Delhi High Court on 4 April 2016 held that keeping a criminal case pending for indefinite period amounts to violation of constitutional rights of the accused recognized under Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution of India.The ruling was passed by Justice Suresh Kait in Joginder Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) case.The court also quashed the first information report (FIR) registered at Mangolpuri police station against Joginder Singh, with the allegations of forgery of documents of a stolen car and the consequential proceedings in the trial court.Criminal cases against accused were pending since 1998, although nothing material was brought to the notice delaying the process of framing charge against Singh. The FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468 (forgery for cheating) and 471 (using as genuine a forged document) of Indian Penal Code.The court said that the case could not be registered against the accused only on the basis of disclosure statement without any supporting material.While quashing the FIR, the court referred Supreme Court’s judgment of 2009 case of the Vakil Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar which was termed as violation of constitutional guarantee of a speedy investigation and trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Monthly Current Affairs

Fresherslive telegram Group

Current Affairs Section

Daily Current Affairs Quiz

Subscribe to Current Affairs

Enter your email to get daily current affairs

Current Affairs Weekly PDF

Current Affairs Monthly PDF

Current Affairs Quiz

Current Affairs Monthly PDF Hindi

Currentt Affairs 2019 January

20 JANUARY
NEWS
19 JANUARY
NEWS
18 JANUARY
NEWS
17 JANUARY
NEWS

Currentt Affairs 2018 December

31 DECEMBER
NEWS
30 DECEMBER
NEWS
29 DECEMBER
NEWS
28 DECEMBER
NEWS

Currentt Affairs 2018 November

30 NOVEMBER
NEWS
29 NOVEMBER
NEWS
28 NOVEMBER
NEWS
27 NOVEMBER
NEWS