Keeping a criminal case pending is violation of Article 21 of Constitution: Delhi HC

Posted on:05 Apr 2016 17:47:03
Keeping a criminal case pending is violation of Article 21 of Constitution: Delhi HC
05 April 2016 Current Affairs: Delhi High Court on 4 April 2016 held that keeping a criminal case pending for indefinite period amounts to violation of constitutional rights of the accused recognized under Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution of India.The ruling was passed by Justice Suresh Kait in Joginder Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) case.The court also quashed the first information report (FIR) registered at Mangolpuri police station against Joginder Singh, with the allegations of forgery of documents of a stolen car and the consequential proceedings in the trial court.Criminal cases against accused were pending since 1998, although nothing material was brought to the notice delaying the process of framing charge against Singh. The FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468 (forgery for cheating) and 471 (using as genuine a forged document) of Indian Penal Code.The court said that the case could not be registered against the accused only on the basis of disclosure statement without any supporting material.While quashing the FIR, the court referred Supreme Court’s judgment of 2009 case of the Vakil Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar which was termed as violation of constitutional guarantee of a speedy investigation and trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Delhi High Court on 4 April 2016 held that keeping a criminal case pending for indefinite period amounts to violation of constitutional rights of the accused recognized under Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution of India.The ruling was passed by Justice Suresh Kait in Joginder Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) case.The court also quashed the first information report (FIR) registered at Mangolpuri police station against Joginder Singh, with the allegations of forgery of documents of a stolen car and the consequential proceedings in the trial court.Criminal cases against accused were pending since 1998, although nothing material was brought to the notice delaying the process of framing charge against Singh. The FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468 (forgery for cheating) and 471 (using as genuine a forged document) of Indian Penal Code.The court said that the case could not be registered against the accused only on the basis of disclosure statement without any supporting material.While quashing the FIR, the court referred Supreme Court’s judgment of 2009 case of the Vakil Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar which was termed as violation of constitutional guarantee of a speedy investigation and trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Daily Current Affairs Videos Video Link
22nd April 2019 Current Affairs Video
20th April 2019 Current Affairs Video
19th April 2019 Current Affairs Video
17th April 2019 Current Affairs Video
16th April 2019 Current Affairs Video
Watch more Current Affairs Videos

Monthly Current Affairs

Fresherslive telegram Group

Current Affairs Section

Daily Current Affairs Quiz


Subscribe to Current Affairs

Enter your email to get daily current affairs
SUBSCRIBE

Currentt Affairs 2019 April

23 APRIL
NEWS
22 APRIL
NEWS
21 APRIL
NEWS
20 APRIL
NEWS

Currentt Affairs 2019 March

31 MARCH
NEWS
30 MARCH
NEWS
29 MARCH
NEWS
28 MARCH
NEWS

Currentt Affairs 2019 February

28 FEBRUARY
NEWS
27 FEBRUARY
NEWS
26 FEBRUARY
NEWS
25 FEBRUARY
NEWS




×

₹ 249

₹ 1000

Only 12 days left !