February 2017 Current Affairs
27 FEB
NEWS
25 FEB
NEWS
24 FEB
NEWS
23 FEB
NEWS
22 FEB
NEWS

January 2017 Current Affairs
31 JAN
NEWS
30 JAN
NEWS
28 JAN
NEWS
27 JAN
NEWS
25 JAN
NEWS
24 JAN
NEWS

December 2016 Current Affairs
31 DEC
NEWS
30 DEC
NEWS
29 DEC
NEWS
28 DEC
NEWS
27 DEC
NEWS
26 DEC
NEWS

November 2016 Current Affairs
30 NOV
NEWS
29 NOV
NEWS
28 NOV
NEWS
26 NOV
NEWS
25 NOV
NEWS
24 NOV
NEWS

October 2016 Current Affairs
31 OCT
NEWS
27 OCT
NEWS
26 OCT
NEWS
25 OCT
NEWS
24 OCT
NEWS
22 OCT
NEWS

Income earned from palace rent not taxable: SC

Income earned from palace rent not taxable: SC
07 December 2016 Current Affairs: The Supreme Court (SC) has  held that the income earned by erstwhile rulers of a princely state or by their heirs by renting out a portion of the residential palace is not taxable.

Moreover, the court also smacked the Income Tax department for registering such case despite their income being exempted under Section 10(19A) of the IT Act, 1961.

The ruling was made by a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Abhay Manohar Sapre.

The court was hearing a plea of the ruler of the former princely state of Kota, now a part of Rajasthan, challenging the high court order for bringing his income from rent in the Income Tax net. The ruler owns two residential palaces known as Umed Bhawan Palace and the City Palace.

The ruler is using Umed Bhawan Palace for his residence and a portion of it was rented out to the Ministry of Defence in 1976.

In 1950, the Union Government declared residential palace of an erstwhile ruler as his inalienable ancestral property to be exempted from levy of income tax. But in 1984, the IT department initiated proceedings for assessment of income earned from renting out a portion of the palace.

The IT department contended that IT exemption was given for personal use and income earned from the rent was taxable. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal turned down the plea of the IT department which later moved the Rajasthan High Court.

The High Court ruled that as long as the ruler continued to remain in occupation of his official palace for his own use, he will be entitled to claim exemption but if he let out any part of his palace, he becomes disentitled to claim benefit of exemption.

Quashing the HC order, the Supreme Court held that Section 10(19A) uses the term 'palace' for considering the grant of exemption to the ruler and income earned from renting out a portion of the palace was also exempted.

The government incorporated Section 10(19A) in the IT Act to give exemption to former rulers.


February 2017 Current affairs
27 FEB
NEWS
25 FEB
NEWS
24 FEB
NEWS
23 FEB
NEWS
22 FEB
NEWS

January 2017 Current affairs
31 JAN
NEWS
30 JAN
NEWS
28 JAN
NEWS
27 JAN
NEWS
25 JAN
NEWS
24 JAN
NEWS




December 2016 Current affairs
31 DEC
NEWS
30 DEC
NEWS
29 DEC
NEWS
28 DEC
NEWS
27 DEC
NEWS
26 DEC
NEWS

November 2016 Current affairs
30 NOV
NEWS
29 NOV
NEWS
28 NOV
NEWS
26 NOV
NEWS
25 NOV
NEWS
24 NOV
NEWS

October 2016 Current affairs
31 OCT
NEWS
27 OCT
NEWS
26 OCT
NEWS
25 OCT
NEWS
24 OCT
NEWS
22 OCT
NEWS



FreshersLive - No.1 Job site in India. Fresherslive Current Affairs 2017 section offers informative quiz questions with answers regarding latest current affairs today for all sorts of competitive exams like UPSC, TNPSC , IFS, IAS, IPS, railway exams (RRB) and banking exams like IPBS PO, IPBS clerk, Federal Bank PO, ICICI, SBI, RBI legal officer & Grade officer posts and much more. Register with us to get latest Current Affairs Updates. Also get latest Current Affairs news and quiz Updates for free alerts daily through E-mail

Get Daily Current Affairs to your Email

You can Unsubscribe us at any time.

Get Daily Current Affairs to your Email

You can Unsubscribe us at any time.